Closia™-Y
Safety I.V. catheter of PUR with closed system
false
pd-y-32
Latest evolution in intravenous and subcutaneous therapy, offering substantial improvements over traditional catheters. Its design addresses persistent issues such as blood contamination, infection risk, and complications linked to insertion and maintenance.
neutrals-100
pd-y-32
Product Range
2
neutrals-100
variation-3-carousel
variation-3-carousel
Closia™ - Y NL
Y-connection with needleless valve & luer lock adapter
variation-3-carousel
Closia™ - Y
Y-connection with two luer lock adapters
Product Features
2
neutrals-100
true
Why Closia™-Y fits your needs
2
neutrals-100
variation-1
cards-3
light-grey-bg
variation-1-card
image
Patients
Safe and Comfortable Care
- Reduces risk of catheter-related infections2
- Optimizes efficiency in intravenous therapies2,3
- Supports extended indwell times, which decreases the frequency of re-sticks and reduces complications including phlebitis, occlusion, and dislodgement2,4
variation-1-card
image
Nurses
Safe, Simple, Smart Care
- Designed to decrease risk of needle stick injury
- Efficient, one-handed use with a simple workflow
- Secure handling and clear confirmation of vessel entry
- Fast, pressure-rated flow even in smaller gauges
- Designed to minimise blood exposure and protection to bloodborne pathogens
- Intravenous & subcutaneous application
- Easy‑to‑learn system enabling quick implementation2
variation-1-card
image
Hospital Staff
Safe Work, Clean Spaces, Smooth Care
- Wide range of sizes from 16 to 26G to support diverse clinical needs
- Echogenic feature which allows deeper vein entry3
- Improves efficiency for healthcare professionals, saving time and simplifying workflows3
Item Specifications
2
neutrals-100
Closia™ - Y
5
neutrals-100
Closia™ - Y NL
5
neutrals-100
Unit box: 25 pieces
Shipping carton: 100 pieces
Shelf life: 5 years
Sterilisation: EO
Shipping carton: 100 pieces
Shelf life: 5 years
Sterilisation: EO
neutrals-100
References
text
Available on gauges 16, 18 or 20
Data on file
text
González López JL, Arribi Vilela A, Fernández del Palacio E, et al. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2014;86(2):117–126.
text
Tamura N, Abe S, Hagimoto K, et al. Unfavourable peripheral intravenous catheter replacements can be reduced using an integrated closed intravenous catheter system. Journal of Vascular Access. 2014;15(4):257–263.
Internal data
text
Graves N, Barnett AG, Rosenthal VD. Open versus closed IV infusion systems: a state-based model to predict risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infections. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000188.